| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
41. Sticky:Dev blog: Skill trading in New Eden - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
The mouth-breathers claiming this is not P2W are wrong. When one loses a T3Cruiser they lose a skill level. Now they can "buy" that skill back instantly. This becomes important in long 0.0 wars where T3C fleets are more preferred for non-capital ...
- by King Aires - at 2016.01.21 04:58:21
|
42. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Darek Castigatus wrote: Christ this is getting sad, its like watching a pair of one legged men try to have an asskicking contest. Getting flashbacks of watching Karate Kid back in the day
- by King Aires - at 2016.01.20 16:19:26
|
43. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Remiel Pollard wrote: Lucas Kell wrote: Remiel Pollard wrote: Which is a good reason not to overinflate the player base faster than CCP can update the hardware to keep up with growth, because instancing is bad for EVE and not something th...
- by King Aires - at 2016.01.20 13:17:38
|
44. Incursions in 0.0 Space? - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: Myst3rious En1gma wrote: I understand spawning of Incursions in high sec space and have no complaints as there is a number of specialized communities that race to farm them as quickly as possible. For those of us who make o...
- by King Aires - at 2016.01.19 19:18:01
|
45. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: Lucas Kell wrote: Jenn aSide wrote: I have told you no such thing ever. Whether you are here or not is on you. I am questioning the sanity of such actions. What you do is you try to twist it so it seems that the ...
- by King Aires - at 2016.01.19 16:38:41
|
46. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Frostys Virpio wrote: I like how everybody is trying to pin the losses of subs on their pet reason instead of thinking that maybe everybody is partially right and every single one of those reasons caused some losses. 200+ pages of everyone thi...
- by King Aires - at 2016.01.19 15:59:25
|
47. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Frostys Virpio wrote: King Aires wrote: baltec1 wrote: King Aires wrote: And buffs to ganking? How about the 700dps Catalyst, More expensive than the old brutix, battleships, thrasher etc that we used to use. Brutix hull wa...
- by King Aires - at 2016.01.19 15:42:49
|
48. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nana Skalski wrote: Someone please change the title of this topic to: Lengthy debacles followed by "Prove it" post. Every thread that Tippia posts in turns into a "prove it" thread Every thread Baltec1 posts in turns into a "They made Ev...
- by King Aires - at 2016.01.19 15:41:38
|
49. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: King Aires wrote: And buffs to ganking? How about the 700dps Catalyst, More expensive than the old brutix, battleships, thrasher etc that we used to use. Brutix hull was never ever less than 17mil, so the hull alon...
- by King Aires - at 2016.01.19 15:35:55
|
50. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Lucas Kell wrote: So removed clone costs weren't a buff? You warp the pod off, it cant die in highsec unless you chose to let it happen. Clone costs mean nothing. King Aires wrote: And the bowhead wasn't? Both of t...
- by King Aires - at 2016.01.19 14:50:02
|
51. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: baltec1 wrote: We don't consider them mining barges which is what was being talked about when those numbers were produced. baltec. Here is a quote from you, which is what you were asked to prove: baltec1 wrote: EVE was g...
- by King Aires - at 2016.01.19 14:11:15
|
52. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Bloomer wrote: Tippia wrote: King Aires wrote: I actually followed your link. And it doesn't say what you think it says. You have the quotes. Please show where they differ from what was said and written. Quote: Ganking events starte...
- by King Aires - at 2016.01.19 13:42:34
|
53. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I actually followed your link. And it doesn't say what you think it says. They are listing the first jihadswarm ganking event of 2008 for Q1 and Q1 only. Those numbers are an anomaly and don't support baltec1's theory that 2012 was worse than 201...
- by King Aires - at 2016.01.19 13:21:12
|
54. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: baltec1 wrote: I showed you, that you are unwilling to follow information or links is not my problem. No, you didn't. You simply restated that ice interdictions happened and still ignored the record breaking gank events fr...
- by King Aires - at 2016.01.19 12:55:20
|
55. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Nothing remotely close to a link to the evidence Starting to think you are going to run circles forever
- by King Aires - at 2016.01.19 01:42:52
|
56. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Captain Tardbar wrote: Still. Were these ship deaths in Hi, Null, or Low Sec? I mean if they are in null, they weren't care bears. That wasn't really the question, and if you want to try to get that level of detail, you'll p...
- by King Aires - at 2016.01.19 00:49:41
|
57. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Captain Tardbar wrote: Scipio Artelius wrote: Lucas Kell wrote: Scipio Artelius wrote: Can you explain what is wrong about the 2015 figures? I just double checked them and they look correct as presented, based on the data you linked. ...
- by King Aires - at 2016.01.19 00:06:38
|
58. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: King Aires wrote: You can make up whatever numbers you want. Ah, so that's your problem. You think that official statistics, collected by CCP's economics team, are GÇ£made upGÇ¥. Or are you saying that the API-collected num...
- by King Aires - at 2016.01.18 22:34:24
|
59. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: [code]-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-áQ1 2008-á-á-á2015 (worst month) Procurer-á-á-á-á-á17-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á49.0 Retriever-á-á-á115.8-á-á-á-á-á-á-á6.8 Covetor-á-á-á-á-á-á30.0-á-á-á-á-á-á-á1.3 -á-á-á-á-á-á-áGêæ-á-á-á-á162.8-á-á-á-á-á-á57.1-...
- by King Aires - at 2016.01.18 22:11:23
|
60. Sticky:Dev blog: Skill trading in New Eden - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Sizeof Void wrote: King Aires wrote: Sizeof Void wrote: EvilweaselFinance wrote: i think like every single person raging against this change just has a high-sp character and is v. angry they are no longer elite for having paid subscrip...
- by King Aires - at 2016.01.18 20:04:02
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |